Advisory
Deal & Exit Structuring Advisory
Optimise tax, cash flow and protection before money changes hands.
Overview
The moment of maximum tax exposure for most entrepreneurs and shareholders is the period immediately before a material liquidity event — a trade sale, secondary buyout, IPO, or significant asset disposal. Pre-exit structuring — correctly repositioning the holding company, managing IP migration, aligning personal tax residency, and ensuring the consideration structure minimises tax leakage — can create outcomes worth multiples of any advisory fee. The challenge is that this work must be done before the deal is announced, before heads of terms are signed, and — in most cases — well before the shareholder has a clear view on timing. The founders who achieve the best outcomes engage 12–24 months before they expect to transact. HPT Group provides pre-exit and deal structuring advisory for founders, shareholders, management teams and investors with material transactions in progress or anticipated. Our advisory covers the full spectrum of pre-exit structuring: holding company insertion or migration, IP value extraction and migration to a lower-tax jurisdiction, personal tax residency change aligned to the transaction timeline, earn-out and deferred consideration tax optimisation, rollover equity structuring for partial exits, and SPV structuring for complex multi-party transactions. We do not provide domestic M&A legal advice — we provide the international structuring strategy that sits above the deal. Our clients include founder-shareholders of technology, services and consumer businesses planning trade sales to strategic or private equity buyers, management teams managing buy-in and buy-out transactions, family business owners restructuring for generational transfer, and fund managers and investors planning portfolio company disposals. We work alongside your existing M&A lawyers and accountants — providing the cross-border tax and structural analysis that domestic advisors rarely have the international breadth to address.
What's Included
- Pre-exit tax planning
- Deal structuring advisory
- Holding company pre-positioning
- Earn-out and deferred consideration
- Cross-border M&A structuring
Typical Engagement Timeline
From first contact to
fully implemented structure.
Timelines vary by engagement complexity and jurisdiction. The steps below reflect a typical instruction from initial application through to active implementation.
Day 1
Application
Submit your application and structured intake form. We review your situation, confirm fit, and agree scope and fees in writing before any work begins.
Days 3–5
Diagnosis Call
A 90-minute senior strategy call to cover your current structure, residency, revenue flows, risk exposure and goals. All relevant documents reviewed in advance.
Days 10–21
Blueprint Delivery
Written memorandum delivered covering current position analysis, proposed structure with diagrams, jurisdiction rationale, and implementation sequencing.
Weeks 3–18
Implementation
Entity formation, banking introductions, registered agent setup, compliance calendar and substance design — all coordinated and managed by the HPT senior team.
Day 1
Application
Submit your application and structured intake form. We review your situation, confirm fit, and agree scope and fees in writing before any work begins.
Days 3–5
Diagnosis Call
A 90-minute senior strategy call to cover your current structure, residency, revenue flows, risk exposure and goals. All relevant documents reviewed in advance.
Days 10–21
Blueprint Delivery
Written memorandum delivered covering current position analysis, proposed structure with diagrams, jurisdiction rationale, and implementation sequencing.
Weeks 3–18
Implementation
Entity formation, banking introductions, registered agent setup, compliance calendar and substance design — all coordinated and managed by the HPT senior team.
Capabilities
What this service covers.
Pre-Exit Holding Company Restructuring
Inserting or migrating a holding company in an appropriate jurisdiction — Cayman, Malta, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Singapore or UAE — in the 12–36 months before a transaction can fundamentally change the tax treatment of exit proceeds. A Malta holding company receiving sale proceeds benefits from the Participation Exemption under Article 12 of the Income Tax Act, Cap 123 — producing an effective 0% Maltese tax on capital gains from qualifying shareholdings. A Singapore holding company benefits from no capital gains tax under the Singapore territorial system. A UK Substantial Shareholding Exemption (TCGA 1992 ss.192A–192N) provides a corporate-level CGT exemption for qualifying corporate sellers. We assess which regime is optimal for your transaction structure.
IP Migration & Value Extraction
Intellectual property — patents, trademarks, software, brand value, customer lists, data assets — frequently represents a significant proportion of enterprise value in a technology or services business. Migrating IP to a holding company in a jurisdiction with a favourable IP box regime (Malta 0% under s.12(1)(h) ITA on royalties from qualifying IP; Netherlands Innovation Box at 9%; Luxembourg IP Box at 6.8%; Ireland Modified Nexus BEPS-aligned regime at 6.25%) before the IP is reflected in the sale price can generate significant value. Migration must be executed at fair market value to avoid transfer pricing challenges, and the timing and form of migration relative to the eventual sale must be structured to avoid UK TAAR or equivalent anti-avoidance provisions.
Earn-Out & Deferred Consideration Structuring
Earn-out payments, deferred consideration, seller loan notes, contingent value rights and warrants are frequently structured without consideration of their differential tax treatment. In the UK, cash earn-outs are typically taxed as capital gains in the year of receipt — but their timing and form can sometimes be managed through loan note elections under TCGA 1992 s.138A, allowing deferral to the year of redemption. Escrow arrangements, milestone-based payments and management incentive arrangements tied to post-completion performance require careful analysis of PAYE vs CGT characterisation. We advise on how to structure deferred consideration elements before heads of terms are agreed.
SPV & Acquisition Vehicle Structuring
For acquisitions involving multiple asset classes, multiple vendors, leveraged buyouts or cross-border structures, the acquisition vehicle design determines the efficiency of debt interest deductibility, the tax treatment of management equity, the structure of vendor loan notes, and the exit route for the acquirer. A Cayman-incorporated NewCo with a Luxembourg intermediate holdco and a UK operating company beneath it creates a specific interest deduction, transfer pricing and exit profile. We advise on the acquisition vehicle structure, the inter-company financing arrangements, the management equity incentive scheme, and the post-close cash extraction strategy from the operating company.
Jurisdictions Covered
8+ jurisdictions.
Directly advised and operationally active.
Jurisdictions Covered
Where we operate and advise.
Cayman Islands
Zero tax on capital gains, dividends and interest. No stamp duty on share transfers. Standard for private equity fund-level exits and institutional SPV structures. Cayman exempted companies and limited partnerships are widely understood by global institutional buyers. No BEPS Pillar Two minimum tax obligation for non-MNE structures. Excellent legal market for M&A documentation. CIMA oversight for fund-related structures.
Malta
Participation Exemption under the Income Tax Act Cap 123, Article 12 provides 0% Maltese tax on capital gains and dividends from qualifying shareholdings (10%+ participation, held for at least 12 months, in non-Maltese-resident subsidiaries not in a low-tax jurisdiction). EU member state with treaty network of 70+ countries and access to EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive. Effective tax rate on exit for properly structured Malta holdco: 0–5% depending on imputation refund mechanism used.
Netherlands
Participation Exemption (deelnemingsvrijstelling) under the Dutch Corporate Income Tax Act (Wet VPB 1969, Article 13) provides full exemption from Dutch corporate tax on gains and dividends from qualifying participations (5%+ shareholding not held as portfolio investment). Extensive treaty network of 90+ agreements. Strong institutional acceptance. No Dutch withholding on dividends to treaty partners. Used widely as an intermediate EU holding jurisdiction in complex cross-border transactions.
Luxembourg
SOPARFI (Société de Participations Financières) holding company benefiting from the Luxembourg Participation Exemption (Article 166 LITL) on gains and dividends from qualifying participations. EU treaty access and Parent-Subsidiary Directive application. No withholding on dividends to qualifying EU parent companies. Standard holding jurisdiction for institutional private equity and infrastructure fund structures. Net wealth tax applies but is typically minimal for holding companies.
Singapore
No capital gains tax on any disposal under Singapore's territorial system. No dividend withholding tax for non-resident shareholders. Treaty network of 90+ agreements. Approved Holding Company scheme and tax incentives available for regional headquarters. No thin capitalisation rules. Strong institutional credibility for Asia-Pacific exit structures. Singapore-based holding companies benefit from active management and control requirements that are commercially achievable.
UAE (DIFC & ADGM)
0% corporate tax on qualifying income for DIFC and ADGM entities (subject to Pillar Two minimum for large MNEs). DIFC Companies Law and ADGM Companies Regulations provide common law M&A frameworks familiar to international deal lawyers. No UAE capital gains tax. No UAE withholding tax on distributions. Growing track record as a holdco jurisdiction for MENA and emerging market exits. UAE-Cayman or UAE-Singapore combination increasingly used for regional fund exit structures.
Ireland
12.5% corporate tax rate on trading income under the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 — the lowest in the EU for trading companies. Participation Exemption on gains from qualifying subsidiaries under TCA 1997 s.626B. IP Box (Knowledge Development Box) at 6.25% effective rate on qualifying IP income. Gateway for US/EU deal structures given strong US treaty position and familiarity to US-headquartered buyers and investors. Strong M&A legal market and deep English-language deal community.
United Kingdom
Substantial Shareholding Exemption (SSE) under TCGA 1992 ss.192A–192N provides a full corporate capital gains tax exemption for corporate sellers of shares in qualifying trading companies (12%+ shareholding held for at least 12 months). UK holdco can be the right answer where the SSE applies, particularly for UK-based management teams and family businesses. S.455 CTA 2010 and BADR (Business Asset Disposal Relief, formerly Entrepreneurs' Relief) under TCGA 1992 s.169H provide individual-level tax reliefs for qualifying shareholder exits.
How It Works
From instruction to implementation.
Transaction Analysis
We review the proposed deal structure, transaction timeline, parties involved, consideration mechanics (cash, shares, loan notes, earn-out), current corporate structure and individual shareholders' tax residency positions. We identify the key tax exposures — the likely tax quantum at each level of the structure under the current arrangement — and map the restructuring opportunities available within the available timeline. We also assess the TAAR, anti-avoidance and substance risks applicable to each potential restructuring option, so you have a realistic picture of what is achievable and what creates unacceptable risk.
Restructuring Blueprint
We produce a written restructuring plan — presented as a formal advisory memorandum — covering: which entities to insert or migrate and why; how to migrate IP value to the appropriate holding jurisdiction; what personal residency actions are required and their timeline; how deferred consideration and earn-out elements should be structured; the interaction between the proposed structure and your home country's anti-avoidance rules; and the expected quantum of tax saving versus the cost and risk of implementation. The blueprint provides your domestic lawyers and accountants with the international structural framework they need to implement domestic filings.
Implementation Coordination
We work alongside your M&A lawyers, domestic tax advisors and corporate secretaries to implement the pre-exit restructuring within the agreed timeline. This includes managing any necessary court or regulatory approvals for cross-border mergers or company migrations, co-ordinating the IP transfer pricing documentation required to support asset migration, ensuring economic substance is established in any new holding jurisdiction, and confirming that all restructuring steps are completed and evidenced before any deal documentation is signed. We maintain a transaction timeline and milestone log throughout the implementation phase.
Post-Close Optimisation
Following transaction close, we advise on how to deploy and structure sale proceeds — into offshore trusts, new holding structures, real estate acquisition vehicles or investment portfolios — to preserve the benefit of the pre-exit planning. We advise on the sequencing of distributions from the holding company to personal accounts in the most tax-efficient manner, the treatment of any retained equity or rollover consideration, and the structure of any reinvestment of proceeds into new ventures. We also confirm post-close compliance obligations: capital gains tax returns, exit tax elections and any required disclosure to domestic tax authorities.
Comparable Client Outcomes
What clients have achieved with this service.
Anonymised and generalised for confidentiality. All outcomes reflect real engagements. Results vary by individual circumstances, jurisdiction and timing.
- UK founder
Holding company restructuring completed ahead of £3.2M share sale — CGT saving of approximately £640,000 through pre-exit reorganisation and treaty-eligible disposal route.
- Irish SaaS founder (USD 14M exit)
Offshore holding pre-positioning and share purchase agreement structuring completed in 11 weeks — effective tax on exit proceeds reduced from 33% to 12.5% through compliant IP holding arrangement.
- Australian trade sale (AUD 8.5M)
Earn-out and deferred consideration structure designed to manage capital gains exposure across two tax years — combined effective saving of approximately AUD 920,000.
Key Questions
What clients ask us.
Straight answers to the questions that come up in every engagement. If your question is not here, ask us directly.
Ask a Question →The ideal lead time is 12–24 months before transaction close. Some specific structures — inserting a Malta or Cayman holdco — can be implemented in 4–8 weeks. Personal residency changes require a minimum of 6–12 months to be defensible against challenge. IP migrations require fair market value transfer pricing documentation and a period of genuine economic activity in the new jurisdiction before the sale to avoid the UK TAAR targeting pre-planned arrangements. The earlier you engage, the more structuring options are available and the lower the anti-avoidance risk. Engaging at heads of terms stage severely limits what is achievable.
Engage immediately. Even at a late stage — after heads of terms but before a signed SPA — there are frequently structuring options available: the form of consideration can be restructured (loan notes vs cash); specific assets can be separated from the main sale before completion; earn-out mechanics can be redesigned; vendor finance arrangements can be structured with tax deferral in mind. Do not assume nothing can be done. We have identified six-figure tax savings in transactions where we were engaged two weeks before signing. The cost of not calling us at this stage is potentially enormous.
The principal anti-avoidance risks are jurisdiction-specific. UK: TAAR (Transactions in Securities Rules) under ITA 2007 ss.684–713 target arrangements where a main purpose is obtaining an income tax advantage through a company transaction. UK: GAAR (General Anti-Abuse Rule, Finance Act 2013 s.206) applies where an arrangement is abusive. Australia: Part IVA of the ITAA 1936 applies to schemes with a dominant purpose of obtaining a tax benefit. US: Step Transaction Doctrine and economic substance doctrine. Germany: Gesamtplanrechtsprechung (overall plan doctrine). We assess these risks specifically and in writing before recommending any pre-exit action.
No — and we are explicit about this. We provide the international structuring strategy: the holdco insertion rationale, the IP migration structure, the residency component, the cross-border consideration mechanics, the earn-out tax analysis. Your domestic accountant implements the UK, Australian or German tax filings and elections. Your M&A lawyer drafts the transaction documents. We work alongside both, providing the overarching international framework and coordinating the structural elements that cross jurisdictional boundaries. Clear demarcation of responsibilities avoids gaps and duplication.
Rollover equity — where a selling shareholder retains a percentage equity stake in the acquiring vehicle (typically a PE-backed NewCo) rather than receiving 100% cash consideration — is a standard feature of management buyout and secondary buyout transactions. The tax treatment of rolled equity depends on whether the rollover qualifies as a share-for-share exchange under TCGA 1992 s.135 (deferring the CGT crystallisation), whether the new shares represent a separate class with a different economic profile, and how management equity (sweet equity, growth shares, ratchet equity) is treated relative to ordinary shareholder equity. We advise on the rollover equity structure from a tax perspective before negotiating its terms with the acquirer.
IP migration — transferring patents, trademarks, software copyrights, brand rights or data assets from an operating company to a holding company in a lower-tax jurisdiction — must be executed at arm's length fair market value to satisfy transfer pricing rules (OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines, BEPS Action 8–10). A formal IP valuation is required. The holding company must then have genuine economic substance sufficient to own and commercially exploit the IP — employees, decision-making, R&D direction. Ongoing royalty payments from the operating company to the IP holdco must be at market rates and supported by an intercompany agreement. The DEMPE analysis (Development, Enhancement, Maintenance, Protection, Exploitation) determines which entity is entitled to IP profits under BEPS-aligned rules.
Important Notes
- —The optimal time to engage is 12–24 months before a transaction — not after heads of terms are signed. The earliest engagement provides the most structural options and the lowest anti-avoidance risk.
- —Pre-exit structures must have genuine commercial rationale beyond tax efficiency. Structures implemented solely for tax purposes, immediately before a known transaction, with no economic substance, are precisely what TAAR, GAAR, Part IVA and equivalent anti-avoidance rules target.
- —We coordinate with local counsel in all relevant jurisdictions. We provide the international structural analysis — we do not provide domestic tax advice, prepare domestic tax returns, or draft M&A transaction documents.
- —Transfer pricing documentation is required for all inter-company transactions — IP migrations, inter-company loans, management fee arrangements and royalty payments. This documentation must be contemporaneous and defensible at arm's length.
- —Post-close, the distribution of sale proceeds from the holding company to individual shareholders must be planned as carefully as the pre-exit structure. The holding company's jurisdiction and the shareholder's residency at the time of distribution together determine the withholding tax and personal tax treatment.
- —Advisory fees from £5,000 depending on transaction size, number of jurisdictions involved, complexity of the pre-exit restructuring and whether ongoing post-close advisory is required.
Get HPT intelligence in your inbox
Offshore structuring analysis, jurisdiction updates, and tax planning insights. No marketing. Unsubscribe any time.
Get Started
Ready to discuss your situation?
Apply to become a client and tell us about your business, assets and goals. We will assess fit and outline terms before any charges are incurred.
Related Services
Services that are frequently combined with or complement this practice area.